Actor-Critic Thinking MCP Server

A dual-perspective thinking analysis server based on Model Context Protocol (MCP), providing comprehensive performance evaluation through Actor-Critic methodology.

Features

• Dual-perspective Analysis: Alternates between actor (creator/performer) and critic (analyzer/evaluator) perspectives
• Round Tracking: Tracks rounds of dual-perspective analysis
• Balanced Assessment: Combines empathetic understanding with objective analysis
• Multi-dimensional Evaluation: Generates nuanced, multi-dimensional assessments
• Actionable Feedback: Provides constructive improvement suggestions

Use Cases

• Evaluating artistic performances, creative works, or strategic decisions
• Analyzing the gap between intention and execution
• Providing constructive feedback that considers both creative vision and technical execution
• Reviewing complex scenarios that require both empathy and objectivity
• Situations requiring balanced assessment of subjective and objective criteria
• Performance reviews that need both self-reflection and external evaluation
• Creative processes that benefit from iterative refinement

Parameters# Required Parameters

• content (string): Current analysis content from the specified role perspective
• role (string): Perspective role, options:
• "actor": Actor perspective (empathetic/creative viewpoint)
• "critic": Critic perspective (analytical/evaluative viewpoint)
• nextRoundNeeded (boolean): Whether another round of actor-critic dialogue is needed
• thoughtNumber (integer): Current thought number in the sequence (minimum: 1)
• totalThoughts (integer): Total number of thoughts planned (must be odd and >= 3)

Role Perspective Guidelines

Actor perspective should include:

• Understanding intentions, creative choices, emotional context, challenges faced
• Self-reflection on performance and decision-making process
• Explanation of creative vision and goals

Critic perspective should include:

• Technical execution analysis, effectiveness evaluation
• Audience impact assessment, comparative analysis
• Objective feedback and improvement suggestions

How to use

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "actor-critic-thinking": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "mcp-server-actor-critic-thinking"]
    }
  }
}

Installation and Running

npm run build\n\n# Run the server
node dist/index.js

Example Usage

System prompt: > Your task is to generate creative, memorable, and marketable product names based on the provided description and keywords. The product names should be concise (2-4 words), evocative, and easily understood by the target audience. Avoid generic or overly literal names. Instead, aim to create a name that stands out, captures the essence of the product, and leaves a lasting impression. User prompt: > Description: A noise-canceling, wireless, over-ear headphone with a 20-hour battery life and touch controls. Designed for audiophiles and frequent travelers. Keywords: immersive, comfortable, high-fidelity, long-lasting, convenient

Best Practices

1. Start with either actor or critic perspective
2. Alternate between perspectives to maintain balance
3. Continue rounds until comprehensive analysis is achieved
4. Focus on relevant performance aspects
5. Generate balanced assessments that honor both perspectives
6. Provide constructive, actionable feedback
7. Only set nextRoundNeeded to false when analysis is complete